The factor theorem
When you divide a polynomial by , the division leaves a remainder, and that remainder is the value of the polynomial at :
That is the remainder theorem. If the remainder is zero, then divides the polynomial exactly, with nothing left over:
That is the factor theorem. This page proves the first from the division, and reads the second from it.
Before you start
You need three facts.
- Algebraic division. Dividing by gives a quotient and a remainder , with .
- Degree of the remainder. The remainder has a lower degree than the divisor. The divisor has degree , so the remainder has degree — it is a constant, not an expression in .
- Substitution. To work out , replace every by the number and work out the value.
Predict first
Take .
Before you read on, predict: is a factor of ? Work out by hand, and write down whether you expect the division by to come out exactly. Then read the proof and see what that substitution is really computing.
The remainder theorem
When you divide by , do the division as far as it goes. You get a quotient and a remainder:
The divisor has degree . The remainder must have a lower degree, so is a constant. It is a number, not an expression in .
Now substitute into both sides. This is allowed: the two sides are equal for every value of , so they are equal at .
The first bracket is zero, so the first term on the right disappears:
So the remainder is exactly . Multiplying by is not needed to find it, and neither is the division. Substituting one number gives the remainder.
What a zero remainder means
A factor divides exactly. That means the division leaves no remainder, so . Put into the division identity:
The right-hand side is multiplied by a whole polynomial, and it equals . So is a factor of .
The remainder theorem says . So is the same statement as . Putting the two together gives the factor theorem:
The double arrow means both directions hold. If is a factor, then the division has no remainder and . If , then the remainder is zero, so the division has nothing left over and is a factor. Each direction is the same division identity read a different way.
Why this is useful. Finding a factor of a cubic takes work; substituting a number takes one line. The factor theorem turns the division into a substitution. It also explains why one root is enough to start factorising: if , then , and has degree one less than . A cubic becomes a quadratic, which you can factorise in the usual way.
A factor with a coefficient: (ax - b)
The theorem is written for . A linear factor may have a number in front of the , such as . Take out the coefficient first:
The constant does not change whether the division is exact. Multiplying a polynomial by a non-zero number cannot turn a zero remainder into a non-zero one, or the other way round. So is a factor of exactly when is a factor, which is exactly when
Example. Is a factor of ? Here the value to substitute is :
The value is zero, so is a factor. Indeed, .
Check your understanding
- Work out the remainder when is divided by .
- Show that is a factor of .
- Is a factor of ? Give a reason.
Answers
- By the remainder theorem the remainder is : . The remainder is .
- Write as , so . Then . The value is zero, so by the factor theorem is a factor.
- Write as , so the value to substitute is . Then $p\left(-\frac{1}{3}\right) = 3 \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{27}\right)
- \frac{1}{9} - 1 + 1 = -\frac{1}{9} + \frac{1}{9} = 0$. The value is zero, so is a factor.
A common error
For the divisor , substitute , with the sign that makes the bracket zero. The divisor is , so substitute , not . Substituting the wrong sign turns a factor into a non-factor, or the reverse.
The other trap is treating a non-zero remainder as if it were zero. If , then is not a factor, and the division is not finished. The full statement is
The value is the remainder, and it belongs in the answer.